The Challenger Brand Trap: When Bold Talk Replaces Bold Moves
“We’re a challenger brand.”
You’ve heard it. Maybe you’ve even said it. These days, it feels like everyone wants to wear the badge. Startups say it to sound scrappy. Big brands say it to seem cool. Agencies toss it around like confetti in creative briefs.
But somewhere along the way, the challenger brand stopped meaning something and started meaning anything.
And that’s a problem.
When every brand claims to be a challenger, the term loses its edge. More importantly, brands lose sight of what it really takes to reshape the world around them.
Because that’s what true challengers do. They don’t just disrupt. They create. They build new models. New conversations. New expectations. And they do it with intention.
Let’s rewind.
The original idea of a challenger brand wasn’t about size. It wasn’t about being loud or cheeky or clever on social media. It was about mindset. As Adam Morgan laid out in Eating the Big Fish, challenger brands don’t mimic the leaders in their space. They question the very structure of the category. They make conscious choices, often bold and sometimes uncomfortable, that signal who they are and what they stand for.
That’s not about style. That’s about substance.
Take Liquid Death. They didn’t just launch another canned water. They created a brand that refused to whisper. They pushed against the entire idea that water has to be tame or forgettable. Their identity wasn’t decoration. It was a deliberate rejection of the norm. And it worked because it was rooted in a clear, creative conviction.
Or look at Oatly. They didn’t just market oat milk. They challenged the dairy establishment, flipped regulatory pressure into marketing fuel, and used every inch of their packaging to provoke a conversation. Their entire brand is a manifestation of the Creator’s impulse to reimagine and reframe what’s possible.
Contrast that with what we often see today. Legacy brands making safe moves under the guise of rebellion. A new font, a cheeky tagline, a splashy color palette, and suddenly they’re a “challenger.” But surface-level style without a deeper creative stance doesn’t make a brand a force for change. It makes it a follower in disguise.
A brand can’t challenge convention while clinging to it. You can’t shift a system you’re still trying to fit into. The label only works when the behavior behind it is real.
Because true challengers don’t just say something different. They create something different.
They don’t chase attention. They earn relevance. They build stories with tension, shape identities with meaning, and commit to a vision that pushes boundaries. That is the Creator at work. Expressive, disciplined, and deeply intentional.
And here’s the truth. Not every brand is meant to be a challenger.
That’s not a weakness. It’s clarity. If you’re a leader, lead. If you’re a classic, preserve what matters. If you’re evolving, do it with care. Challenger isn’t the only compelling story. It’s just one of many. But when brands perform the role without believing the mission, the story falls flat.
So let’s be honest with the words we choose. Let’s be deliberate with the brands we build.
Because challenger status isn’t a title. It’s a responsibility. One that belongs to those brave enough to create what hasn’t been seen before. Looking to stand apart? Let's talk!